vs
Resize Products To Their Real Size
1. Put a credit card or any other plastic card on the image
2. Click the + and - keys until both match
You can also press + and - keys for scaling, r key to reset sizes and ESC to close
| memory | ||||
| Lots more RAM memory | 1 GB | vs | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB more RAM memory. |
| Noticeably more internal storage | 64 GB | vs | 32 GB | 32 GB more internal storage. |
| camera | ||||
| Less shutter lag | 0.24 s | vs | 1.3 s | 1.06 s less shutter lag. How long does the camera need to take a photo without having to focus. |
| Has a dedicated camera button | Yes | vs | No | A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily. |
| Can create panoramas in-camera | Yes | vs | No | Device allows taking multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene and then stitch them together into a single photo. |
| Significantly more megapixel (photo, front camera) | 1.2 MP | vs | 0.3 MP | 4x more megapixel (photo, front camera). |
| Has AF tracking | Yes | vs | No | With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots. |
| Less startup delay | 0.84 s | vs | 2.2 s | 1.36 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture. |
| Has continuous autofocus when recording movies | Yes | vs | No | When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. |
| Substantially faster maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 s | vs | 1/1000 s | 2x faster maximum shutter speed. A faster maximum shutter speed allows taking pictures of fast moving subjects without blur. |
| Has touch autofocus | Yes | vs | No | The autofocus is immediately set to the subject by just touching it on the touch screen. |
| Has manual iso | Yes | vs | No | This allows to manually set the ISO level. |
| Has manual white balance | Yes | vs | No | This allows to manually set the white balance. |
| Has a built-in HDR mode | Yes | vs | No | It can automatically shoot pictures with an higher dynamic range (HDR). |
| cpu | ||||
| Vastly smaller semiconductor size/newer CPU | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | 28.89% smaller semiconductor size/newer CPU. |
| Faster CPU clock speed | 2x 1.3 GHz | vs | 1x 0.8 GHz | 3.25x faster CPU clock speed. |
| os | ||||
| Slightly more apps available | 800,000 | vs | 750,000 | 6.67% more apps available. |
| physical | ||||
| Thinner | 7.6 mm | vs | 9.3 mm | 1.7 mm thinner. |
| Marginally less body volume | 55.1 cm³ | vs | 60.6 cm³ | 9.08% less body volume. |
| Lighter | 112 g | vs | 137 g | 25 g lighter. |
| lens | ||||
| Clearly wider aperture | f/2.4 | vs | f/2.8 | 14.29% wider aperture. The wider an aperture, the more light the image sensor gets. More light helps avoiding blur by employing a faster shutter speed. Aperture sizes are expressed in f-stops, the smaller the better. In addition, wide lenses provide a narrow depth of field enabling to focus on the subject and blur the background. |
| display | ||||
| Higher resolution | 640 x 1136 px | vs | 640 x 960 px | 18.33% higher resolution. |
| Bigger screen size | 4" | vs | 3.5" | 14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. |
| recording | ||||
| Marginally more microphone(s) | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. |
| connectivity | ||||
| Substantially faster downloads | 100 MBits/s | vs | 7.2 MBits/s | 13.89x faster downloads. |
| Significantly newer Bluetooth Version | 4 | vs | 2.1 | Newer Bluetooth Version. |
| Definitely faster uploads | 50 MBits/s | vs | 5.76 MBits/s | 8.68x faster uploads. |
| power | ||||
| Slightly more battery power | 1,440 mAh | vs | 1,418 mAh | 1.55% more battery power. |
| physical | ||||
| A lot lower SAR for body (USA) | 1.11 W/kg | vs | 1.18 W/kg | 0.07 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA. |
| Shorter | 115.2 mm | vs | 123.8 mm | 8.6 mm shorter. |
| Marginally lower SAR for head (EU) | 0.93 W/kg | vs | 0.95 W/kg | 0.02 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU. |
| A tad lower SAR for head (USA) | 1.17 W/kg | vs | 1.18 W/kg | 0.01 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA. |
Check the Top 5 comparisons
Compare with other products