vs
Resize Products To Their Real Size
1. Put a credit card or any other plastic card on the image
2. Click the + and - keys until both match
You can also press + and - keys for scaling, r key to reset sizes and ESC to close
| recording | ||||
| Somewhat more microphone(s) | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more microphone(s). More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. |
| power | ||||
| Modestly more battery power | 1,440 mAh | vs | 1,418 mAh | 1.55% more battery power. |
| camera | ||||
| Notably less shutter lag | 0.24 s | vs | 0.4 s | 0.16 s less shutter lag. How long does the camera need to take a photo without having to focus. |
| Considerably more megapixel (photo, front camera) | 1.2 MP | vs | 0.3 MP | 4x more megapixel (photo, front camera). |
| Has a dedicated camera button | Yes | vs | No | A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily. |
| Has manual iso | Yes | vs | No | This allows to manually set the ISO level. |
| Clearly less startup delay | 0.84 s | vs | 1.4 s | 0.56 s less startup delay. It takes less time for the camera to turn on and take a first picture. |
| Has AF tracking | Yes | vs | No | With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus shots. |
| Has continuous autofocus when recording movies | Yes | vs | No | When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. |
| memory | ||||
| Much more RAM memory | 1 GB | vs | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB more RAM memory. |
| connectivity | ||||
| Notably faster uploads | 50 MBits/s | vs | 5.76 MBits/s | 8.68x faster uploads. |
| Sizably faster downloads | 100 MBits/s | vs | 14.4 MBits/s | 6.94x faster downloads. |
| cpu | ||||
| Sizably smaller semiconductor size/newer CPU | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | 28.89% smaller semiconductor size/newer CPU. |
| Faster CPU clock speed | 2x 1.3 GHz | vs | 2x 1 GHz | 30% faster CPU clock speed. |
| display | ||||
| Bigger screen size | 4" | vs | 3.5" | 14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. |
| Higher resolution | 640 x 1136 px | vs | 640 x 960 px | 18.33% higher resolution. |
| physical | ||||
| A little less body volume | 55.1 cm³ | vs | 60.6 cm³ | 9.08% less body volume. |
| Thinner | 7.6 mm | vs | 9.3 mm | 1.7 mm thinner. |
| Lighter | 112 g | vs | 140 g | 28 g lighter. |
| Lower SAR for head (EU) | 0.95 W/kg | vs | 0.99 W/kg | 0.04 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU. |
| physical | ||||
| Appreciably lower SAR for body (USA) | 0.98 W/kg | vs | 1.18 W/kg | 0.2 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA. |
| Shorter | 115.2 mm | vs | 123.8 mm | 8.6 mm shorter. |
Check the Top 5 comparisons
Compare with other products