vs
Resize Products To Their Real Size
1. Put a credit card or any other plastic card on the image
2. Click the + and - keys until both match
You can also press + and - keys for scaling, r key to reset sizes and ESC to close
| connectivity | ||||
| Has NFC | Yes | vs | No | Near-field-communication (NFC) allows wireless transactions like payments. |
| Has DLNA | Yes | vs | No | It can stream videos and movies to other devices over-the-air, using the standard DLNA protocol. |
| Has USB mass storage support | Yes | vs | No | It can transfer files, music, photos via USB, no need to install additional software. |
| physical | ||||
| Has stereo speakers | Yes | vs | No | Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience. |
| Considerably lower SAR for head (USA) | 1.08 W/kg | vs | 1.18 W/kg | 0.1 W/kg lower SAR for head (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA. |
| Measurably lower SAR for head (EU) | 0.7 W/kg | vs | 0.95 W/kg | 0.25 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU. |
| Notably lower SAR for body (USA) | 0.91 W/kg | vs | 1.18 W/kg | 0.27 W/kg lower SAR for body (USA). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at hip level. The legal limit is 1.6 W/kg in the USA. |
| cpu | ||||
| Faster CPU clock speed | 2x 1.5 GHz | vs | 2x 1.3 GHz | 15.38% faster CPU clock speed. |
| Measurably smaller semiconductor size | 28 nm | vs | 32 nm | 12.5% smaller semiconductor size. A smaller size indicates that the process to create the chip is newer. |
| lens | ||||
| Sizably wider aperture | f/2 | vs | f/2.4 | 16.67% wider aperture. The wider an aperture, the more light the image sensor gets. More light helps avoiding blur by employing a faster shutter speed. Aperture sizes are expressed in f-stops, the smaller the better. In addition, wide lenses provide a narrow depth of field enabling to focus on the subject and blur the background. |
| camera | ||||
| Has a brand lens | Yes | vs | No | A brand manufacturer provides the camera's lens. |
| Substantially more megapixel (photo) | 8.7 MP | vs | 8 MP | 8.75% more megapixel (photo). |
| Has a serial shot mode | Yes | vs | No | You can shoot multiple pictures in a row. |
| Has manual exposure | Yes | vs | No | This allows to manually set the exposure. |
| A lot more megapixel (photo, front camera) | 1.3 MP | vs | 1.2 MP | 8.33% more megapixel (photo, front camera). |
| Has sensor shift stabilization | Yes | vs | No | The sensor capturing the image can be moved in such a way as to counteract the motion of the camera, often referred to as mechanical image stabilization which is superior to a electronic stabilization only. When the camera rotates, causing angular error, gyroscopes encode information to the actuator that moves the sensor. |
| Has a flash w/ dual-LEDs | Yes | vs | No | Two LEDs are brighter than flashes with just one LED. |
| Has an image stabilizer | Yes | vs | No | Avoids blurry shots, usually most cameras are equipped with electronic image stabilizers. |
| Has a two-stage shutter | Yes | vs | No | A two-stage shutter allows photo shooting like a pro: with the first press the camera focusses, with the second it shoots. |
| display | ||||
| Higher resolution | 768 x 1280 px | vs | 640 x 1136 px | 35.21% higher resolution. |
| Has a Corning® Gorilla® Glass display | Yes | vs | No | Special glass that is durable enough to resist many real-world events that commonly cause glass failure. |
| A little higher pixel density | 332 ppi | vs | 326 ppi | 1.84% higher pixel density. |
| Bigger screen size | 4.5" | vs | 4" | 12.5% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. |
| power | ||||
| Can be charged via standard USB cable | Yes | vs | No | It can be charged and operated with a standard USB cable with your computer or with USB power supplies. |
| Wireless charging | Yes | vs | No | It can be charged w/o any plugs and wires similar to electric shavers or toothbrushes (as extra). |
| Amply more battery power | 2,000 mAh | vs | 1,440 mAh | 38.89% more battery power. |
| physical | ||||
| Thinner | 7.6 mm | vs | 10.7 mm | 3.1 mm thinner. |
| Shorter | 123.8 mm | vs | 130.3 mm | 6.5 mm shorter. |
| Lighter | 114 g | vs | 185 g | 71 g lighter. |
| Noticeably less body volume | 55.1 cm³ | vs | 98.71 cm³ | 44.18% less body volume. |
| Narrower | 58.6 mm | vs | 70.8 mm | 12.2 mm narrower. |
| os | ||||
| Appreciably more apps available | 750,000 | vs | 150,000 | 5x more apps available. |
| camera | ||||
| Has a built-in HDR mode | Yes | vs | No | It can automatically shoot pictures with an higher dynamic range (HDR). |
Check the Top 5 comparisons
Compare with other products