14 Reasons for the Sony Xperia U

|
memory
|
| Noticeably more internal storage |
8 GB |
vs |
4 GB |
4 GB more internal storage.
|
|
connectivity
|
| Definitely faster downloads |
14.4 MBits/s |
vs |
7.2 MBits/s |
2x faster downloads.
|
|
physical
|
| Has stereo speakers |
Yes |
vs |
No |
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
|
| Narrower |
54 mm |
vs |
59.4 mm |
5.4 mm narrower.
|
| Shorter |
112 mm |
vs |
113 mm |
1 mm shorter.
|
|
display
|
| Noticeably higher pixel density |
280 ppi |
vs |
165 ppi |
1.7x higher pixel density.
|
| Higher resolution |
480 x 854 px |
vs |
480 x 320 px |
2.67x higher resolution.
|
|
camera
|
| Has an image stabilizer |
Yes |
vs |
No |
Avoids blurry shots, usually most cameras are equipped with electronic image stabilizers.
|
| Better video recording quality |
720p @30 fps |
vs |
480p @30 fps |
1.5x better video recording quality.
|
| Can create panoramas in-camera |
Yes |
vs |
No |
Device allows taking multiple photos capturing different parts of the scene and then stitch them together into a single photo.
|
| Has manual white balance |
Yes |
vs |
No |
This allows to manually set the white balance.
|
| Has a back side-illuminated sensor |
Yes |
vs |
No |
BSI (Backside Illuminated Sensor) is a new type of image sensor which features a better quality in poor lighting conditions and better overall sharpness and image quality.
|
| Has manual iso |
Yes |
vs |
No |
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
|
|
cpu
|
| Faster CPU clock speed |
2x 1 GHz |
vs |
1x 0.8 GHz |
2.5x faster CPU clock speed.
|
|
Was the comparison helpful?
Five Reasons for the Sony Xperia miro
Also known as:
Sony ST23a, Sony ST23i
|
connectivity
|
| Has an external memory slot |
Yes |
vs |
No |
The device has a standard memory slot (such as an SD or micro SD card slot) so that you can either extend the internal storage with affordable memory modules or you can retrieve data, such as photographs, easily from a memory card.
|
|
physical
|
| Thinner |
9.9 mm |
vs |
12 mm |
2.1 mm thinner.
|
| A little bit less body volume |
66.4 cm³ |
vs |
72.5 cm³ |
8.41% less body volume.
|
| Appreciably lower SAR for head (EU) |
0.87 W/kg |
vs |
1.62 W/kg |
0.75 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
|
|
power
|
| More battery power |
1,500 mAh |
vs |
1,320 mAh |
13.64% more battery power.
|
|
Was the comparison helpful?
Compare with other products
Check the Top 5 comparisons
Compare with other products