Ten Reasons for the Sony Xperia U
|
camera
|
| Has 3D photo/video recording capabilities |
Yes |
vs |
No |
This device captures 3D still photos and/or 3D videos due to two separate lenses.
|
| Significantly more megapixel (photo, front camera) |
1.3 MP |
vs |
0.3 MP |
4.33x more megapixel (photo, front camera).
|
| Has manual iso |
Yes |
vs |
No |
This allows to manually set the ISO level.
|
|
physical
|
| Lighter |
110 g |
vs |
120 g |
10 g lighter.
|
| Narrower |
54 mm |
vs |
59.5 mm |
5.5 mm narrower.
|
| Shorter |
112 mm |
vs |
122 mm |
10 mm shorter.
|
| Has stereo speakers |
Yes |
vs |
No |
Devices with stereo speakers deliver sound that surrounds the user from left and right side, creating a richer sound and a better experience.
|
|
power
|
| Has a removable battery |
Yes |
vs |
No |
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken
|
| A little more battery power |
1,320 mAh |
vs |
1,305 mAh |
1.15% more battery power.
|
|
display
|
| Slightly higher pixel density |
280 ppi |
vs |
275 ppi |
1.82% higher pixel density.
|
|
Was the comparison helpful?
17 Reasons for the Sony Xperia P

|
memory
|
| Lots more RAM memory |
1 GB |
vs |
0.5 GB |
0.5 GB more RAM memory.
|
| Noticeably more internal storage |
16 GB |
vs |
8 GB |
8 GB more internal storage.
|
|
connectivity
|
| Has an HDMI output |
Yes |
vs |
No |
Video and movies can be watched on a TV with HDMI input.
|
| Has NFC |
Yes |
vs |
No |
Near-field-communication (NFC) allows wireless transactions like payments.
|
| A little faster uploads |
5.8 MBits/s |
vs |
5.76 MBits/s |
0.69% faster uploads.
|
| Considerably faster downloads |
21 MBits/s |
vs |
14.4 MBits/s |
45.83% faster downloads.
|
|
camera
|
| Has a CMOS sensor |
Yes |
vs |
No |
The CMOS sensor captures the image. Most devices have CCD sensors but some have CMOS sensors which is produced by a CMOS process and has emerged as an alternative to charge-coupled device (CCD) image sensors leading to better image quality.
|
| Has a dedicated camera button |
Yes |
vs |
No |
A dedicated camera button allows you to take snapshots more easily.
|
| Has a two-stage shutter |
Yes |
vs |
No |
A two-stage shutter allows photo shooting like a pro: with the first press the camera focusses, with the second it shoots.
|
| Has continuous autofocus when recording movies |
Yes |
vs |
No |
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp.
|
| Vastly more megapixel (photo) |
8 MP |
vs |
5 MP |
1.6x more megapixel (photo).
|
| Better video recording quality |
1080p @30 fps |
vs |
720p @30 fps |
1.5x better video recording quality.
|
|
physical
|
| A trifle less body volume |
71.9 cm³ |
vs |
72.5 cm³ |
0.83% less body volume.
|
| Thinner |
9.6 mm |
vs |
12 mm |
2.4 mm thinner.
|
| Lower SAR for head (EU) |
0.78 W/kg |
vs |
1.62 W/kg |
0.84 W/kg lower SAR for head (EU). SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) describes how much radio frequency energy emitted by the device will be absorbed by your body. The rate is measured at head level. The legal limit is 2.0 W/kg in the EU.
|
|
display
|
| Bigger screen size |
4" |
vs |
3.5" |
14.29% bigger screen size. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience.
|
| Higher resolution |
540 x 960 px |
vs |
480 x 854 px |
26.46% higher resolution.
|
|
Was the comparison helpful?
Compare with other products
Check the Top 5 comparisons
Compare with other products